Identifiant pérenne de la notice : 212490672
Notice de type
Notice de regroupement
Note publique d'information : CETTE THESE PORTE SUR UNE ETUDE DE CAS CIRCONSTANCIE MAIS ESSENTIEL POUR COMPRENDRE
L'UN DES MYSTERES DE L'HISTOIRE DE FRANCE, CELUI D'UNE MONARCHIE AUTANT INCAPABLE
DE CONSERVER SA TRADITION CONSTITUTIONNELLE QUE DE CREER DES INSTITUTIONS NOUVELLES.
L'ENQUETE CONJUGUE LE RECIT DES FAITS ET L'ANALYSE DE LEURS PRESUPPOSES INTELLECTUELS.
ELLE ETUDIE LA RECONNAISSANCE DES BATARDS ROYAUX DANS LE CONTEXTE DE LA LEGITIMATION
EN DROIT PRIVE. ELLE RECONSTRUIT LEUR ELEVATION SYMBOLIQUE DANS LE SYSTEME DE L'INEGALITE
NATURELLE QUI REGIT L'IDEOLOGIE DU TEMPS. ELLE ANALYSE ENFIN LE PREMIER DEBAT CONSTITUTIONNEL
SUR LA NATURE DE LA MONARCHIE FRANCAISE, PREALABLE A LA REVOCATION SOUS LA REGENCE
DES DISPOSITIONS EN FAVEUR DES BATARDS. LE CONCEPT DE SOUVERAINETE EST AU CENTRE DE
LA PREMIERE PARTIE : LA LEGITIMATION DES BATARDS, MARQUE PAR EXCELLENCE DE LA SOUVERAINETE
RELEVE DE L'ORIGINE DU CONCEPT, CALQUE PAR LES JURISTES SUR L'IDEE OMNIPOTENCE DIVINE.
LA JUSTIFICATION DES RANGS ET DE LA HIERARCHIE SOCIALE RENVOIE A LA DOCTRINE THEOLOGIQUE
DE LA GRACE, DONT J'ANALYSE LES IMPLICATIONS A TRAVERS LE DEBAT SUR LE SALUT QUI OPPOSE
JANSENISTES ET JESUITES. LE PROCES DES BATARDS QUI CLOT MON ENQUETE ILLUSTRE ENFIN
LES CONTRAINTES D'UNE PROCEDURE POLITIQUE NOUVELLE QUI RESTE NEANMOINS FIDELE A LA
LOGIQUE DU POUVOIR QU'ELLE CHERCHE A LIQUIDER.
Note publique d'information : THIS DISSERTATION RESTS ON A LIMITED CASE SQTUDY WHICH FURNISHED AN EXTRAORDINARY
MEANS TO INVESTIGATE ONE OF THE MYSTERIES OF FRENCH HISTORY, THAT OF A MONARCHY AS
INCAPABLE OF SAVING ITS CONSTITUTIONAL TRADITION AS OF CREATING NEW INSTITUTIONS.
THIS INQUIRY IS BASED ON THE RECORDS OF EVENTS AND THE ANALYSIS OF THEIR INTELLECTUAL
PRE,ISES.IT STUDIES THE LEGITIMATION OF ROYAL BASTARDS WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF CIVIL
LAW. IT RECONSTRUCTS THEIR SYMBOLIC ELEVATION WITHIN THE SYSTEM OF NATURAL INEQUALITY
WHICH REPRESENTS THE IDEOLOGICAL BASIS OF OLD REGIME. IT FINALLY ANALYZES THE FIRST
CONSTITUTIONAL DEBATE ON THE NATURE OF FRENCH MONARCHY, BEFORE THE REVOCATION UNDER
THE REGENCY OF THE MEASURES ENACTED BY LOUIS XIV. THE CONCEPT OF ROYAL SOVEREIGNTY
IS AT STAKE IN THE FIRST SECTION: LEGITIMATING NATURAL CHILDREN IS A MARK OF SOVEREIGNTY,
A BODIN SAYS, AND BRINGS OUT THE THEOLOGICAL ORIGINS OF THIS CONCEPT, SHAPED BY JURISTS
ON THE MODEL OF DIVINE OMNIPOTENCE. THE JUSTIFICATION OF RANKS AND SOCIAL HIERARCHY
REFERS TO THE THEOLOGICAL DOCTRINE OF GRACE, ANALYZED IN ITS POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS
IN THE LIGHT OF THE DEBATE ON SALVATION OPPOSING JANSENISTS AND JESUITS. THE TRIAL
OF BASTARDS ILLUSTRATES THE CONTRAINTS OF A NEW POLITICAL PROCEDURE THAT PERPETUATES
THE LOGIC OF A POWER WHICH IT TRIES
paprika.idref.fr
data.idref.fr
Documentation
